Swiss Quantum Ecosystem
Who is most active right now, what signals they send, and how their position is shifting — collected automatically from public sources every day by two independent AI systems.
Actors tracked
40
Active in window
40 / 40
Low-cost signal share
2%
evidence-backed
Ecosystem signal trend
+0
vs previous week
Top actors by signal activity
| Actor | Category | Activity | Δ wk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swiss Quantum Initiative | National initiative | 81.44 | · 0 |
| ETH Zurich Quantum Center | University / research hub | 78.65 | · 0 |
| Basel Precision Instruments | Private company | 66.70 | · 0 |
| Basel Quantum Center at the University of Basel | University / research hub | 64.86 | · 0 |
| Swiss Nanoscience Institute | University / research hub | 54.82 | · 0 |
| National Centre for Competence in Research SPIN | National initiative | 54.17 | · 0 |
| Quantum Science and Engineering Center at EPFL | University / research hub | 40.86 | · 0 |
| Quantum Technology Initiative at CERN | University / research hub | 40.39 | · 0 |
Signal cost mix
Costly, hard-to-fake signals (patents, funding, research) vs low-cost positioning.
What is the ecosystem signalling about?
Ehrenthal et al. (2026)'s four signal types — the primary lens. See methodology for what each covers.
Sub-categories (drill-down)
The 19 sub-dimensions, colour-keyed to their parent signal type above. Cost weighting: High-cost hard-to-fake · Medium · Low-cost low-cost.
Sources: arXiv (research), actor websites, Google News (third-party coverage). Both AI systems write to the same database; see System A vs B and the methodology.